Have never regretted my decision as the results I get from my D700 are, I think, as good as. Now, we have all moved on (mostly to digital MM) and all-electronic cameras like this surely do not age as well as my ever-reliable, always dependable 1961 Rolleiflex 3.5E2.īy then I had also decided to limit any further purchases in MF film cameras anyway, largely due to the ridiculously high cost of 120 roll films in Australia. In its day, well, it would have been ideal. I agree with one poster that the Contax 645 is by now basically an overpriced toy. As it was been a consignment item, the shop refunded the sale (most reluctantly I think, knowing the shop owner) and removed the item from sale. Someone else bought this camera and, I later found out, returned it after a few weeks.
CONTAX 645 NEW PRO
The leading camera repair shop in Melbourne told me confidentially that if it were to malfunction or break down, it would most likely sit gathering dust on one of their shelves for a very long time while they sourced parts for it.Ī pro I knew at the time advised he'd had one for a year, but unloaded it as (in his own words "the electronics were all over the place" and he believed the cameras were basically unreliable for fast shooting in the field. Ditto accessories, few and far between and very pricey. Lenses for were limited in selection and equally hideously expensive.
High camera prices for used models, few turned up in secondhand shops in Sydney or Melbourne. My other reasons for nixing the offer were. This particular camera seemed to function well, but it did look somewhat weather-beaten, which further fueled my suspicions that it would probably not last long. the ergonomics were okay and weight was manageable for a then 65 year old (I wouldn't care to lug it around now at my advanced age of 71). So, from now on, when I refer to the Pentax 645, it can be accounted for that I’m referring to any version.I very briefly considered buying one with the 80mm lens when I retired from architectural work in 2012, but quickly decided not to, mostly for the reasons already stated by other posters in this thread.Ī Melbourne camera shop had one on offer at a surprisingly good price, which led me to suspect it had been used almost to death for weddings or club photography or some such high-volume photo operation. This could have been due to other reasons other than just using the newest version, but I’ve also talking with someone else who had almost the same experience.
CONTAX 645 NEW MANUAL
Now, I will say, I’ve owned all three, yet my manual focus hit-rate has been the highest with the Pentax 645nii. The main spec differences between the Pentax 645n and nii are that the nii included mirror lock up, which is nice if you’re trying to avoid any mirror shake while doing longer exposures.
CONTAX 645 NEW PLUS
I have worked as a photo assistant for years, and we used a Contax 645 with a phase one digital back plus film. See a list here of differences in chart form! differences between the Pentax 645n and nii Top of the line Zeiss lenses, and absolute quality. The newer versions also are slightly lighter at 1280g vs 1320g (about 1.4 oz. Other upgrades to the original 645 include a meter increased by 2 stops worth, an updated meter pattern, one extra frame on 120mm film (15 vs 16 frames), the ability to imprint data onto the film, exposure memory lock, less shutter speeds (but with the ability to use BULB mode), among a few others.
Differences between pentax 645 and newer versions The major differences lies in that the Pentax 645 is manual focus only, while you can both manual and auto-focus (with autofocus lenses, of course) on the two newer versions (n and nii). Up front, let’s go ahead and get this out of the way-spec-wise, all versions of the Pentax 645 are almost identical.
Pentax 645 vs Pentax 645n vs Pentax 645nii
0 kommentar(er)
